Theoretical basis for the perception and identification of organisational reputation
Abstract
Topic relevance. An organisation’s reputation is one of the most important factors determining its long-term success and competitiveness in the market. A strong reputation not only helps the organisation attract new customers and partners, but also strengthens consumer trust. Service organisations are sensitive to environmental changes; thus, reputation has experienced various challenges related to scandals, regulatory violations, and public opinion in recent years. Therefore, it is important to assess how an organisation’s reputation is perceived from the consumer’s point of view and what measures could contribute to strengthening its reputation.
Research problem. Although an organisation’s reputation is recognised as an essential management and communication tool, there is a lack of a unified theoretical model explaining how various stakeholders perceive and identify an organisation’s reputation, and what cognitive and social processes determine this perception.
Practical gap. There is not enough systematic explanation of how different groups (employees, customers, partners, society) interpret the characteristics of the organisation’s activities and form the image of reputation, and what mechanisms they use for this reputation identification.
Theoretical context. In many disciplines (public relations, organisational behaviour, social psychology), the processes of reputation perception and identification are studied fragmentarily, therefore there is a lack of synthesis that would allow creating an integral theoretical basis for explaining this phenomenon.
Research objective. To create and develop a theoretical disclosure that defines the processes of organisational reputation perception and identification, distinguishing the main concepts, mechanisms and interrelationships.
Structural objective. To investigate and analyse the main concepts of reputation perception and identification, to distinguish their attributes, antecedents and consequences, and to create an integrated theoretical basis that reflects the cognitive and social processes of interested parties.
Applied objective. To provide conceptual guidelines for further stages of empirical research, allowing for more accurate measurement of the dimensions of reputation perception and identification in organisational research.
Research objectives:
- To define the theoretical concept of the organisation and the modern organisation.
- To identify the significance of organisational reputation and its formation for the organisation.
- To reveal the factors influencing the reputation of the organisation on consumer trust in the organisation.
Methods. Analysis, synthesis, interpretation, and generalisation of scientific literature.
Results. An organisation is a structure in which people or groups of people coordinate their activities to achieve common goals, having a clear hierarchical management system and regulated activities that ensure efficiency and control. Classical organisations usually follow a traditional structure, where decisions are made from the top down, but today’s organisations are increasingly seeking more flexible models that would allow for faster response to changes and promote innovation. Modern organisations are dynamic and able to adapt to a rapidly changing environment, integrating innovations and technologies into their operations. They not only respond to market changes, but also actively initiate them, seeking competitive advantage and long-term growth. Organisational reputation is a dynamic and complex process influenced by many factors, both internal and external. Internal factors, such as organisational culture, values, and employee well-being, are key elements determining an organisation’s reputation, but external factors, such as market dynamics, social responsibility, and innovation, also have a significant impact. Effective reputation management includes both proactive and reactive strategies that help an organisation maintain its positive image and ensure long-term competitiveness. An organisation’s reputation has a significant impact on consumer trust. A well-established reputation helps build long-term relationships with employees, customers, investors, and other stakeholders. Companies that demonstrate transparency, behave ethically, and actively contribute to social responsibility are more likely to receive positive reviews and hold strong relationships with consumers. Trust remains a key factor determining an organisation’s long-term success and competitiveness in the market.
Keywords: reputation, organisation, modern organisation, consumer.
References
1. Birškytė, L. (2020). The effects of IRS audit rates on state individual income tax compliance [Nepublikuota magistro baigiamojo darbo medžiaga]. Indiana University.
2. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.
3. Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame & fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. FT press. Corporate Public Affairs, 14(1), 21–22. https://www.accpa.com.au/downloads/2004_1_Article6.pdf
4. Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540008
5. Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
6. Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
7. Ghuslan, M. I., Jaffar, R., Mohd Saleh, N., & Yaacob, M. H. (2021). Corporate governance and corporate reputation: The role of environmental and social reporting quality. Sustainability, 13(18), 10452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810452
8. Janinovic, J., Pekovic, S., Vuckovic, D., Djokovic, R., & Peic, M. (2020). Innovative strategies for creating and assessing research quality and societal impact in social sciences and humanities. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 18(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.18.4.5
9. Jankauskas, P. (2021). Komunikacijos įtaka organizacijos efektyvumui: formalūs ir neformalūs kanalai [Nepublikuota magistro baigiamojo darbo medžiaga]. Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
10. Juščius, V., Šneiderienė, A., & Griauslytė, J. (2020). Assesment of the benefits of corporate social responsibility reports as one of the marketing tools. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 11(3), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v11i3.612
11. Kazlauskaitė, R., & Česynienė, R. (2022). Darbo organizavimo principai įmonėse: tradicijos ir pokyčiai [Nepublikuota magistro baigiamojo darbo medžiaga]. Kauno technologijos universitetas.
12. Kim, S. (2019). The process model of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with corporate reputation, trust, and corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
13. Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1
14. Li, S., Spry, L., & Woodall, T. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Construction Materials, 2(3), 1041–1045. https://doi.org/10.36756/JCM.v2.3.2
15. Meissner, J. O., Heike, M., & Sigrist, D. (2024). Modern organizational concepts. In Organizational design in a complex and unstable world: Introduction to models and concepts and their application (pp. 51–70). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45022-9_4
16. Petrauskas, A. (2023). Organizacijų valdymas ir strateginiai sprendimai [Nepublikuota magistro baigiamojo darbo medžiaga]. Vilniaus universitetas.
17. Popovic, S., Bjelica, D., Zarubica, M., Pekovic, S., & Matic, R. (2021). Attitudes of sport organization officials toward links between the sports sector, sports industry, and knowledge organizations with innovations in Montenegrin sport. Sport Mont, 19(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.210619
18. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2020). Corporate reputation and sustained superior performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.274
19. Stankevičienė, A. (2020). Organizacijos kultūros reikšmė darbuotojų įsitraukimui ir veiklos rezultatams [Nepublikuota magistro baigiamojo darbo medžiaga]. ISM Vadybos ir ekonomikos universitetas.
20. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
21. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
22. Ulanavičiūtė, Ž. (2021). IT sektoriaus darbdavių korporatyvinės reputacijos formavimo sprendimai [Magistro baigiamasis darbas]. Vilniaus universitetas.
23. Van Riel, C. B., & Fombrun, C. J. (2020). Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390931
24. Vasiliauskas, T. (2021). Lankstumas organizacijose: privalumai ir iššūkiai [Nepublikuota magistro darbo medžiaga]. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas.
25. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
26. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
27. Wimmer, K. (2021). Holacracy – Die hierarchie der kreise ein organisationsmodell ohne chefs? https://www.wimmer-partner.at/pdf.dateien/holacracy.pdf
28. Xuetong, W., Hussain, M., Rasool, S. F., & Mohelska, H. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable competitive advantages: The mediating role of corporate reputation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(34), 46207–46220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28192-7
29. Zakarevičius, P. (2012). Modernios organizacijos bruožai. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, (64), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.7220/MOSR.1392.1142.2012.64.9
30. Žemgulytė, A. (2023). Sąsajos tarp vartotojo pasitikėjimo organizacija, socialinės atsakomybės priemonių ir organizacijos produkto kokybės vertinimas [Daktaro disertacija]. Vilniaus universitetas.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s). Published by Lithuanian Sports University.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.